“In romances formerly written, every transaction and
sentiment was so remote from all that passes among men, that the reader was in
very little danger of making any application to himself,” – Samuel Johnson (The Rambler)
“But when an adventurer is leveled with the rest of
the world, […] young spectators fix their eyes upon him with closer attention,
and hope by observing his behavior and success to regulate their own practices,
when they shall be engaged in the like part.” – Samuel Johnson (The Rambler)
The reason I chose two quotes from the same essay is
because (1) I didn’t necessarily need a quote from this week’s reading of Female Quixote and (2) the two quotes
here are describing two opposing ways in which a novel may affect a person-- there is actually a third reason: I didn't really understand what the thesis of the essay was and thus couldn't grasp the main point he was getting at.
Although Johnson categorizes them as how old and new romances affect readers
differently, I would give another distinction between the two descriptions as
people who identify and people that do not identify with the protagonist (or
antagonist if that’s how you see yourself).
The first description explains why it is that the
youth wouldn’t necessarily imitate the actions of heroes and villains because
people do not usually see themselves as being all totally good or totally bad.
In reality, people are both, meaning that our motives generally stem from our
own necessities and individual values while action heroes’ motives are usually practically
unrealistic.
The other option is when the reader does identify
with the main characters within a story. Johnson says it’s because the “adventurer
is levelled with the rest of the world.” For example, I guy like me with, an
average physique, wouldn’t necessarily adhere to Hercules’s actions, but I
would understand the frustration Mr. Glanville has of Arabella because that is
something most men go through – being dumbfounded by the (seemingly) irrational
decisions and actions of their lover.
Reading The
Female Quixote, for me, resembles the former description of not identifying
with the protagonist of the story. I would never look to Arabella for dating
advice in a real-life situation. On the other hand, when Arabella is reading
her romances and absorbing all the ideals presented in those stories, she sees
herself in the Heroines of her novels, to her they are, Johnson would say, on
the same level playing field. This conforms to the latter description of novels
influencing actions of the youth. We see Arabella using the events in her
romances as guidelines as to how one should court throughout all of book I. The
only difference with Arabella and I is that I do not see my life as being an
ancient romance, unfortunately Arabella identifies with that more than she
conforms to the real world.
No comments:
Post a Comment